|
|
|||
CONTACT
US!
|
MIAMI
RIVER COMMISSION GREENWAY SUBCOMMITTEE AND QUALITY OF LIFE JOINT MINUTES: Minutes of meeting |
FEB. 1, 2000 9:00 AM (THIS IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT) |
|
|
The Joint Quality of Life (QOL)
Working Group and Greenway Subcommittee meeting was called to order at
approximately 9:15am at the Miami River Inn, 118 South River Drive, City
of Miami. Working members (or their representatives) attending were:
|
|
||
|
I ntroductions were made. Minutes from the December 8, 1999 joint meeting of the Quality of Life Working Group and Greenway Subcommittee were approved.Chuck Flink updated the group on the status and progress of the Miami River Greenway Master Plan (GMP). He stated that a revised edition of the Inventory Report will be sent to the committee by February 15 for further review. The challenging part of the process is the development of a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) database for the river. Lavinia Battle outlined the request for shapefile information from DERM, per a memo from Sara Chambers of Greenways, Inc. Chuck stated that along with the geographical database, the GMP will have a report that will influence the development of a greenway system. The two will work together to raise awareness and develop the plan. Data collection will continue throughout the course of the year-long planning process. Chuck stated that the working draft of the concept plan divides the river into 5 themes based on the field inventory conducted by his staff. The proposed themes are as follows:
The themes will be further defined with input from the committee through
review of the initial draft of the Concept Plan. The first draft will be
distributed in early March. Concept maps will be developed, reviewed and
improved before presentation to the public. The first draft of the
Concept Plan will be reworked by the committee as well as professional
public agency staff March 8-9. The public meetings will give us an
opportunity to provide the community with information about the GMP
concept and will give the public the opportunity to give us input in the
planning process. Comprehensive Development Master Plan Amendment Application An
application for a Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) amendment
has been advertised regarding property adjacent to Allied Marine. Jim
Murley stated that a CDMP amendment is broad and appropriate for Miami
River Commission review. Ernie Martin stated that discussions need to occur with the City of Miami to try to get a review process in place. He also asked about the review process for CDMP applications. Sara Ingle volunteered to help the committee understand what happened in this case. Comprehensive Development Master Plan Overlay Planning District Dave Miller gave an
update, stating the Miami River Commission (MRC) wrote a letter
recommending a joint planning group from the city and county to take
advantage of HB17. He and Bob Parks met with Commissioner Arthur Teele
regarding dredging and also mentioned this issue. Commissioner Teele is
in support of a comprehensive plan for the river corridor. Sara Ingle stated that the City approved on first reading a resolution designating the entire city as an urban infill area. The resolution is now on its way to the state. A transmittal letter to the state will outline the city's intent. Ernie stated the MRC needs to be listed in the transmittal letter. Chuck stated that Portland, OR was successful with an overlay area that was established in the 1970s. It instilled a process for first line review for development on its river. The importance of the economic impact statement was discussed as an important element in this process. Doug Yoder stated that he would follow-up with the property appraiser's office regarding property information that would be available on the internet. Urban Design Committee : Ben Starrett gave an update on the work of the Urban Design Committee (UDC). The team has met twice and each member happened to attend The Trust for Public Land's National Advisory Council Meeting in Chattanooga, TN where first-hand information about its center was obtained. Neal McAliley and Maricarmen Martinez have adopted the South Florida Design Center as their project for the Miami Fellows Initiative.Ben distributed a document developed by the team titled, "A Prospectus for a South Florida Design Center" which highlights various models across the country. Based on the research, the successful design centers have multiple funding sources, a perception of independence, a strong design component and promotes the philosophy of good growth. The team found Chattanooga's model to be inspiring because it incorporates these elements. The concept here is for the Miami River Greenway Master Plan process to act as a pilot center that would eventually be expanded to cover the South Florida region. Furthermore, the concept is for the design center to service the public and governing bodies and the private sector will then follow. Chattanooga should be the standard, where the public played a key role. It was suggested that the builders association be a part of the process. Maurice Ferre recommended calling the center an "Urban Design Center." He also suggested that the process be a top down and bottom up decision making process. He recommended more community involvement in the process and stated that education and strong public leadership is essential to getting the Hispanic community involved. He also recommended that a group of elected officials be taken to Chattanooga in order to get the concept of a local Urban Design Center on the radar screen. Jim suggested that the emphasis should be placed on the fact that it will be a public center to help the political leadership. In addition, the center should be considered a technology center that will benefit our education system. Ben asked for any input or comments be sent via email to bstarrett@collinscenter.org or call him or Karla Ebenbach at (305) 377-4484. Announcements:
Jim mentioned the Miami River
Improvement Bill that will be considered by the State Legislature. He
also created a new ad hoc committee to study the economic impacts of the
tunnel/bridge issue. He also informed the group that no action had been
taken on the Gate House issue. The meeting was adjourned. |
|||
|
HOME
|
CALENDARS
|
ABOUT
THE RIVER |
ABOUT THE COMMISSION |
DREDGING |
GREENWAYS |
|||